• Language

    • enEnglish
    • zh-hans简体中文
nuvit-hk.com
nuvit-hk.comnuvit-hk.com
  • Language

    • enEnglish
    • zh-hans简体中文
  • About us
  • Products
    • Vitamin A
    • Vitamin B
    • Vitamin C
    • Vitamin D
    • Vitamin E
    • Vitamin H
    • Vitamin K
    • Inositol
    • Other
  • Quality and Service
  • Corporation
  • News
  • Contact
  • About us
  • Products
    • Vitamin A
    • Vitamin B
    • Vitamin C
    • Vitamin D
    • Vitamin E
    • Vitamin H
    • Vitamin K
    • Inositol
    • Other
  • Quality and Service
  • Corporation
  • News
  • Contact
News

SCIENTIFIC SURVEY: HOW ABOUT SWILL FEED FOR PIGS?

Admin2018-05-02T09:49:39+00:00

Professionals in the UK swine business do not necessarily reject the re-introduction of swill in swine feed, if concerns like disease control and consumer acceptance were addressed. That conclusion was drawn researchers on the basis of a survey.

Amid recent calls to promote a more circular economy, a team of researchers from universities in the UK and Belgium conducted a survey of 82 pig farmers and 81 other agricultural stakeholders at the most recent UK Pig & Poultry Fair, held in May 2016. The scientists informed about their attitudes toward the use of food losses in pig feed, and the potential relegalisation of swill (the use of cooked food losses as feed).

The use of swill feed (based on food waste) is a controversial subject. Photo: Dreamstime

The outcome of the research was published in the online peer-reviewed scientific journal PLOS One in April 2018. Earlier, also Pig Progress’ sister title Farmers Weekly also did a poll at this same trade show.

Strong support for relegalisation of swill

The researchers wrote: “While most respondents found the use of feeds containing animal by-products or with the potential for intra-species recycling (i.e. pigs eating pork products) to be less acceptable than feeds without, we found strong support (>75%) for the relegalisation of swill among both pig farmers and other stakeholders.”

Read more on pig health in the Pig Progress Health Tool

Read more on pig health in the Pig Progress Health Tool

Aiming to understand the people’s relegalisation of swill, they wrote: “Respondents who were concerned about disease control and the perception of the pork industry supported relegalisation less, while people who were concerned with farm financial performance and efficiency or who thought that swill would benefit the environment and reduce trade-deficits, were more supportive.”

Consumer acceptance of swill-fed pork

The survey included 18 questions, including the acceptability of 10 different sources of food losses in pig feed.

Based on the survey, the researchers concluded, “Our results provide a baseline estimate of support amongst the large-scale pig industry for the relegalisation of swill, and suggest that proponents for its relegalisation must address concerns about disease control and the consumer acceptance of swill-fed pork.”

Read also: Should swill feed be regulated in the EU?

Controversial issue in pig business

The topic or relegislation of swill feed is very controversial, as many compound feed producers strongly emphasise feed safety. Often, there are references to diseases as African Swine Fever (ASF) or Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD), which are a risk when feeding swill.

Especially in 2001, the FMD outbreak in the United Kingdom led to a virtual ban on the use of food losses in animal feed. More than often, professional organisations like e.g. the UK National Pig Association, have warned about the use of food waste in pigs.

Legislation limits the potential for nutrient recycling

The researchers stated, “These regulations deliver a safe food system to millions of Europeans, though they are not without their trade-offs. The current legislation limits the potential for nutrient recycling and a circular economy-food losses that are not used as feed are instead disposed of in less efficient ways, lower down the food waste hierarchy.”

The article in PLOS One was authored by Erasmus K.H.J. zu Ermgassen, Eleanor Bladon, Ramy Salemdeeb and Andrew Balmford, Cambridge University, UK; and Moira Kelly, Ghent University, Belgium.

Source: Vincent ter Beek

(www.pigprogress.net)

Share this post

FacebookTwitterLinkedInGoogle +Email

Related Posts

4 WAYS TO INCREASE LIVESTOCK SUSTAINABILITY

Sustainable farming can be understood as the production of food in an economically profitable, socially acceptable and environmentally neutral... read more

MATO GROSSO: FROM SOY STATE TO CORN STATE

Mato Grosso is known as the main soybean-producing state in Brazil. But also its corn production has been increased... read more

LOW WATER IN CANALS: FEED STORAGE AT RISK

Due to the extremely low water level of rivers and canals in Northwest Europe, the supply of raw materials... read more

CURCUMIN: A POWERFUL BIOACTIVE FOR SHEEP

Curcumin is a natural bioactive compound and is known to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions. But can it also... read more

RED AND GREEN ALGAE PROMOTING GUT HEALTH

Seaweed contains ‘sulphated polysaccharides’ – components that are not found in plants, yeast or microalgae. Yet animals do react... read more

PIGS AND HURRICANES

Recently, Hurricane Florence hit North Carolina, claiming over 5,000 pigs. As hurricanes continue to come, perhaps it is time... read more

INSECT MEAL AND OIL FOR ATLANTIC SALMON

Insect derived ingredients take off in aquaculture after the EU approved the use such ingredients in 2017. But what... read more

DIFFERENT INGREDIENTS, DIFFERENT VITAMIN LEVELS

Vitamins are an indispensable trace nutrient for animals. But how much vitamins are in commonly used feed ingredients for... read more

IFIF AND FAO CONTINUE TO STRENGTHEN PARTNERSHIP

IFIF and FAO continue to strengthen their collaboration on critical issues to ensure safe and sustainable feed and food. This... read more

GLOBAL FOOD PRICES SHOW DECLINE THROUGH OCTOBER

International food commodity prices dipped in October, as falling dairy, meat and vegetable oils prices more than offset a... read more

GENERAL

  • General terms conditions
  • Privace policy
  • Disclaimer

OFFICE

  • Nutrition Vitamins Co., Ltd
  • Head office: Wilson House 1001-2, 19 Wyndham Street, Central, HongKong
  • Email: nuvit.co@gmail.com
  • Website: www.nuvit-hk.com